Photograph of Marine Le Pen in 2025, the year of the Paris verdict
Marine Le Pen in 2025, the year of the Paris criminal court's verdict. Photograph by Vox España (CC0, via Wikimedia Commons).

Legal Cases

Charges, verdicts, sentences, and appeal status — reported as dry fact, with the procedural status stated exactly as of September 2026.

The case: European Parliament funds (2004–2016)

The prosecution alleged that between 2004 and 2016, the National Front used European Parliament funds intended to pay parliamentary assistants to MEPs — including Marine Le Pen, an MEP from 2004 to 2017 — for people who in fact worked for the national party. Twenty-five defendants (including Le Pen) and the party as a legal entity stood trial at the Paris criminal court in late 2024. Le Pen denied criminal wrongdoing throughout; during the appeal proceedings she stated she had “absolutely no sense of having committed the slightest offense” (as reported in press summaries of the hearings).

The 31 March 2025 verdict

The Paris criminal court convicted her of embezzlement of public funds (détournement de fonds publics). The sentence:

The court also convicted the other defendants and the party (fined €2 million, half suspended, in the party’s case as reported). The immediate ineligibility was the decisive element: under French electoral law, a five-year ban running from March 2025 would have barred her from the 2027 presidential election.

Her public characterization of the verdict — “this is not a judicial decision, it is a political decision” (6 April 2025 rally) — is reported here as her own characterization. The court presented the ruling as a criminal judgment. This site does not adjudicate between the two framings.

The appeal: 7 July 2026

The Paris Court of Appeal upheld the conviction but reduced the penalties:

That evening she announced her candidacy for the 2027 presidential election.

Procedural status as of September 2026

Earlier proceedings

She was acquitted in the proceedings arising from her 10 December 2010 Lyon speech (the “street prayers” remarks), which had drawn an incitement complaint.

A note on method

This page states only what courts have decided and what the parties have said, with each attributed. It does not characterize the verdicts as just or unjust, and it does not present any party’s predictions about the Cour de Cassation as fact. See Methodology for the legal-case reporting policy.

Source notes